I’ve just received an update on the ongoing saga of Diasporan philanthropists George and Carolann Najarian who were allegedly defrauded in Armenia by a businessman rumored to have close contacts with individuals in the General Prosecutor’s Office. If there was any case that illustrated why the Diaspora must come down hard on the authorities regarding the lack of rule of law and increasing high-level government corruption in Armenia it’s this one.
Najarian vs. Igityan: Court rulings ignored by Prosecutor General’s Office
Summary May 2006
In September 2003, K. George Najarian brought criminal charges against Grigor Igityan, a citizen of the Republic of Armenia, for embezzling investments Najarian made in Armenia starting in 1996. Briefly, Igityan acted as Najarian’s representative in two land development projects (1998-2002), and was a partner with him in a Yerevan photo shop which Najarian purchased in 1996 and financed through 2002. Using the limited Power of Attorney Najarian had granted to him, Igityan illegally privatized the land and buildings in question as well as the photo shop in his name. To this day, despite nearly three years of ongoing investigations and five court decisions rendered by Armenia’s criminal courts (including the Court of Cassation), all confirming Najarian’s claims, this case has not been prosecuted and Igityan still holds full title to Najarian’s properties.
On January 25, 2006 the Court of Appeals handed down the 5th decision confirming that this case is a criminal case, and ordered the case to be reopened by the Prosecutor General’s Office. The Court of Cassation, Armenia’s highest court has refused to hear an appeal of this decision, and therefore the Court of Appeals decision stands as law.
The Court of Appeals decision did the following:
Rejected the notion that this is a civil case clearly stating the case is a criminal case.
Pointed out that in dismissing the case again after naming G. Najarian a victim under Armenia’s Criminal Code, the Investigative Body ignored its own evidence again G. Igityan and failed to follow the courts’ directives. By dismissing the case, the Investigative Boday in effect ‘contradicted’ itself.
Asked, “… if there is an absence of corpus delicti against G. Igityan, then who caused G. Najarian property loss…†which clearly occurred through criminal activity?
Cited the Investigative Body for failing to investigate and properly clarifying various aspects of the case all of which the court listed over several pages. (All of the omissions would support the case against Igityan).
Criticized the Investigative Body for not explaining fully the discrepancies in contracts Igityan had contractors sign and which he presented to Najarian and the actual agreements for payment for less that he had with contractors. (Not only did Igityan steal Najarian’s properties, he also embezzled money through manipulating contracts.) The Court cited the Investigative Body for ignoring these and similar findings pointing to criminal activity in making their decision to dismiss this case.
Asked, “… how it is that Igityan has everything, while nothing is registered in Najarian’s name.â€
In conclusion, the judges wrote: “… G. Najarian, a US citizen, is an aggrieved person in this case, who has property loss through actions prohibited by the Criminal Code of RA, that have been confirmed by all three Courts existent in the Republic of Armenia, and stated by the Investigative Body which is carrying out the investigation of the criminal case. Therefore, the person who committed the actions prohibited by the Criminal Code of RA is to be found out and undergo criminal liability.â€
As of this date, nearly 4 months after the above decision, the Prosecutor General’s Office has not obeyed the court’s ruling. Although the investigation has been reopened, the ‘suspect’ has not been named and Najarian’s attorneys continue to be excluded from the investigative process, contrary to the court’s directives as provided for under Armenian law. Letters from their attorneys to the Prosecutor General’s Office go unanswered.
In addition, Najarian’s attorneys have not been allowed the following:
not allowed to see evidence gathered by the Investigative Body;
not allowed to be present when witnesses are interrogated (and many report they have been intimidated and threatened by their interrogators);
not allowed to question Grigor Igityan, the person who against whom we have filed our complaint.
To add to these injustices, the investigators are continuing with their practice of trying to discredit George Najarian and his wife, Dr. Carolann Najarian, by making bizarre claims. For example, they spread a rumor that the Najarians attempted to bribe an official with the promise of a Harvard education for his child. (Anyone familiar with Harvard and the difficulty with getting in knows this is an offer no one from Boston would ever make!) Not only have they tried these kinds of tactics, but investigators have repeatedly tried to intimidate witnesses who have testified in support of our claims with the hope of getting them to change their testimonies.
We are writing to those concerned with human rights and rule of law in Armenia. This case demonstrates a disregard for the rule of law, transparency of process, and due process. The Courts have, in this case, worked diligently and carefully, resisting the pressures brought to bear on them. However, those charged with investigation and prosecution (the Investigative Body in the Prosecutor General’s Office) have ignored the directives of the Courts, thus putting themselves above the law. In Armenia, there is no way to enforce the decisions of the courts.
For anyone interested in the larger issue of corruption in Armenia, there are interviews I conducted with Amalia Kostanyan and Sona Ayvazian from Transparency International here, here, and here. Hetq Online also interviewed Kostanyan recently here.
As per the results of our 2005 study mentioned earlier, 62.9% of the citizens asked believe that the level of corruption in Armenia has substantially increased in the past three years. 4.5% of the respondents think that the level of corruption remains unchanged, and 17.1% could not provide an answer to that question.
The results of a survey by the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development revealed that in the perspective of the businessmen working in our country, in the course of the past three years, corruption has become a more critical problem. While the frequency of illegal payments has decreased, the size of such payments has increased.
Corruption has been a common theme on this blog, and not least because it threatens the future of a nation as a country where it’s citizens can pursue their lives without having to be related to, or without having to grease the hands, of state officials at all levels of government.
All people who love and want Armenia to succeed and thrive need to speak up. Whether it is the Armenian Assembly or the Armenian National Committee, or individual diasporan Armenians, or non-Armenian friends of Armenia, theft of this nature from one should be interpreted as theft from all of us. Moreover, it is a theft from the people of Armenia, not in a monetary sense, but a theft of morals and justice.
Unfortunately it will probably take more cases such as this one involving the Najarians before many in the Diaspora realize how exactly things are done in Armenia.